Here is the chapter on Handel’s operas from the book version of
the article (by Winton Dean) on Handel in the first, 1980, edition of The New Grove.
[1]
It is only [since 1920] that Handel’s operas have been rediscovered;
apart from a fragment of Almira reduced to one short act (1878),
none was staged anywhere between 1754 and 1920.
They were regarded as dead along with the opera seria convention
to which they subscribed.
It is true that Handel did not reform or break out of that convention,
with its concentration on recitative and da capo aria,
an occasional duet, and a happy end expressed in an ensemble or coro,
to the extent that Gluck did.
The way he made it work in the theatre could not be demonstrated
until modern producers discovered how the 18th-century stage operated:
it worked by exploiting its peculiarities and limitations,
such as the single rise and fall of the curtain
at beginning and end of the opera
and the quick scene changes executed in full view of the audience,
and relating them to the musical structure in such a way
as to play on and defeat the listener’s expectation.
[2]
In a narrowly circumscribed convention
a slight deviation can achieve a disproportionate effect.
By manipulating the shape of the da capo aria
and in particular
varying the incidence, length, texture and regularity of the ritornellos
at the beginning and end of the main sections (and in the middle),
and by associating such strokes with a point of drama or character,
he turned the most static of forms into something potentially dynamic.
The number of different designs he created by this means,
with the aid of contrasts in tempo, metre, rhythm and key,
is almost beyond counting;
in extreme cases, such as ‘Deggio dunque’ in Radamisto,
he could deceive the ear into thinking that
the da capo form had been abandoned altogether.
The next step was to give a cumulative dynamic thrust to a scene,
an act and whole opera by so placing the arias
that they build up the characters facet by facet
and at the same time draw taut the dramatic conflict.
Handel did this partly by long-term contrasts of mood and pace
and partly by tonality.
When a slow chromatic aria in the minor
follows several quick pieces in the major,
perhaps with a radical change of scoring,
its impact is greatly enhanced,
especially if it occurs at the point of maximum weight at the end of an act.
Handel sometimes built a whole opera round one tonal centre (Imeno)
and associated characters with particular keys (Cleopatra, Antigone in Admeto);
he regularly pointed a switch of dramatic emphasis by a shift in tonal direction.
That was his almost invariable method of marking a change of scene;
the visual transformation of the sets is reflected in the music.
Such a method depends for success on a coherent and workmanlike libretto
(there is evidence that, at least in the Royal Academy years,
Handel exercised firm control over this)
and on the composer’s ability to deploy an exceptional fund of musical invention
in the arias themselves.
It does not take many weak links to break the chain.
Handel’s greatest operas contain so few inferior or superfluous arias
that they are difficult to cut without damage to the structure.
[3]
In some respects Handel did loosen the convention.
He carried the accompanied recitative
to an elaboration and an intensity of emotion
it had never attained before [Really?
More intense than the plea and lament of Orpheus in Monteverdi’s Orfeo?]
and was not to reach again until Mozart or even later.
In the remarkable episodes of Bajazet’s suicide in Tamerlano and Orlando’s madness,
where simple and accompanied recitative, arioso and aria are intermingled,
the forward drive of the drama takes control and dictates new musical forms.
Elsewhere Handel allowed a character to interrupt another’s aria
or quote it back at him ironically in a different context.
Act 1 of Metastasio’s Poro libretto ends with
a scene in which two estranged lovers do this simultaneously,
each in a mood of disillusionment citing the other’s earlier vow of constancy.
Handel’s setting works the two arias together as an extended duet
that marvelously combines irony, deft counterpoint and lyrical beauty.
Handel exploited the conventional exit after an aria by building up to it:
beginning a scene with a slow or pensive one-part aria (arioso),
followed by a recitative that transforms the dramatic situation
and a full aria for the same character discharging the accumulated emotion,
he evolved the cavatina-cabaletta design of Romantic opera.
He sometimes defeated an unconvincing happy end
by setting the coro to tragic music, regardless of the words,
where the losing cause won his sympathy
(for example in Amadigi, Tamerlano and Imeneo).
With increasing frequency, especially after 1725,
he linked the coro with one or more preceding movements,
whether arias, dances or ensembles, by means of common thematic material,
an anticipation of the extended finales of subsequent practice.
In some of the later operas
(Ariodante, Alcina, the third version of Il pastor fido)
he used a genuine chorus and a ballet;
his integration of these resources and the important element of spectacle
in the dramatic action should, in a sensitive production,
make an immediate appeal to a modern audience.
[4]
Once he had achieved maturity in Agrippina
Handel’s operatic style changed little in 30 years,
apart from the assimilation of new influences already mentioned.
At all periods he wrote operas of different types.
The commonest, as in all 18th-century opera seria,
is heroic in temper with a plot taken from
Roman or Greek history or occasionally from mythology or the Dark Ages.
The characters are concerned with
love, jealousy, dynastic rivalry and the grasp of power;
though they often utter lofty sentiments, their politics are purely personal
(no representative of the common people appears).
This type of libretto became standardized in the work of Metastasio,
a great poet whose artificial symmetry and literary refinement,
though immensely popular with composers (and singers)
who did not look beyond the confines of the aria,
eventually blocked the progress of opera as an art and demanded the surgery of Gluck.
Handel’s three Metastasio operas (Siroe, Poro and Ezio)
show him inspired by the poetry
but inhibited by the stiffness of the characters.
In his finest heroic operas
plot, characters and musical invention are perfectly matched;
the three masterpieces of 1724-5, Giulio Cesare, Tamerlano and Rodelinda,
far surpass the work of any contemporary.
The ‘magic operas’, though only five in number,
are an important and distinctive class;
two of them, Orlando and Alcina,
are among the supreme examples of the form,
and the other three (Rinaldo, Teseo and Amadigi)
contain much superb music, especially in the scenes of sorcery and witchcraft.
The supernatural element reduced the need for the plot to assume a rational course,
admitted the poetic symbolism of the fairy tale,
and released the romantic strain on Handel’s imagination.
The much prized machinery of the Baroque theatre came into its own
in the spectacular transformation scenes.
[5]
A third type of opera embraces serious emotion,
comic or even farcical situations and an element of parody,
mocking the conventions of opera seria (including the castrato hero);
these anti-heroic works,
especially Agrippina, Flavio, Partenope and Serse,
distil a characteristic and individual flavor.
The ability to suggest the profound, the commonplace
and the ridiculous aspects of human behavior,
not only in the same opera but in the same scene and situation,
places Handel beside Monteverdi and Mozart
as a master of dramatic irony on many levels.
The spirit of playful comedy is not absent from Handel’s most serious operas:
Asteria twits her lover’s apparent faithlessness in Tamerlano,
Cleopatra turns her brutal and lascivious brother into a figure of fun,
and Alexander the Great’s duplicity is hilariously exposed
when each of the two women he is courting, having overheard his advances to the other,
quotes back at him in a different key the love music he addressed to her rival.
This comprehensiveness of mood and dramatic approach
gives his operas a depth seldom attained in the history of the art.
But their quality can emerge only from productions based
on a complete understanding of the convention.
[The following sentence is not from the book quoted from above,
but is from the introduction (page 7) by Donald Burrows of
The Cambridge Companion to Handel:]
A good preparation for attendance
at a performance of one of Handel’s operas written for London
is to read through the dual-language libretto
that was printed for the work’s first performance.
[Endnote: The original printed wordbooks have been re-published in facsimile in
Ellen T. Harris (ed.), The Librettos of Handel’s Operas,
fascimilie edition with introductions
(13 vols., New York and London, 1989).]
[That 13 volume edition is hardly easily accessible to most people.
I have tried, rather assiduously, to find on the Internet (as of 2013-08)
English translations of the librettos for
the various Handel operas that I have included in this blog.
The Italian original librettos are generally available in an excellent edition from www.haendel.it,
but as far as I can find there is no source for the English translations.
I would think that a nation as wealthy as the United States could somehow find the money
to put English translations of this cultural treasure on the Internet,
where it could be available for all,
but evidently that does not fit within the budgets of those who fund America's cultural scene
(e.g., the National Endowment for the Arts and
the various foundations and institutions which promote American culture).
The following table started as a copy of the one at Wikipedia as of 2013-02-19,
but was expanded by adding links to my posts on various operas,
and with embeds of videos
when those were available but I had no dedicated post on the subject.
Several videos of Handel operas which were once available on YouTube, but have now been deleted, were ones I particularly admired.
Here are some of them:
Ariodante London 1996, Ivor Bolton with the E.N.O.
Alcina Aix-en-Provence 2015, Andrea Marcon with the Freiburger Barockorchester
No comments:
Post a Comment